Flow of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in perivascular spaces (PVS) is one of the key concepts involved in theories concerning clearance from the brain. Experimental studies have demonstrated both net and oscillatory movement of microspheres in PVS (Mestre et al. (2018), Bedussi et al. (2018)). The oscillatory particle movement has a clear cardiac component, while the mechanisms involved in net movement remain disputed. Using computational fluid dynamics, we computed the CSF velocity and pressure in a PVS surrounding a cerebral artery subject to different forces, representing arterial wall expansion, systemic CSF pressure changes and rigid motions of the artery. The arterial wall expansion generated velocity amplitudes of 60–260 µm/s, which is in the upper range of previously observed values. In the absence of a static pressure gradient, predicted net flow velocities were small (<0.5 µm/s), though reaching up to 7 µm/s for non-physiological PVS lengths. In realistic geometries, a static systemic pressure increase of physiologically plausible magnitude was sufficient to induce net flow velocities of 20–30 µm/s. Moreover, rigid motions of the artery added to the complexity of flow patterns in the PVS. Our study demonstrates that the combination of arterial wall expansion, rigid motions and a static CSF pressure gradient generates net and oscillatory PVS flow, quantitatively comparable with experimental findings. The static CSF pressure gradient required for net flow is small, suggesting that its origin is yet to be determined.
Mathematical models in biology involve many parameters that are uncertain or in some cases unknown. Over the last years, increased computing power has expanded the complexity and increased the number of degrees of freedom of many such models. For this reason, efficient uncertainty quantification algorithms are now needed to explore the often large parameter space of a given model. Advanced Monte Carlo methods such as quasi Monte Carlo (QMC) and multilevel Monte Carlo (MLMC) have become very popular in the mathematical, engineering, and financial literature for the quantification of uncertainty in model predictions. However, applying these methods to physiologically relevant simulations is a difficult task given the typical complexity of the models and geometries involved. In this paper, we design and apply QMC and MLMC methods to quantify uncertainty in a convection-diffusion model for tracer transport within the brain. We show that QMC outperforms standard Monte Carlo simulations when the number of random inputs is small. MLMC considerably outperforms both QMC and standard Monte Carlo methods and should therefore be preferred for brain transport models.
Mathematical models for excitable cells are commonly based on cable theory, which considers a homogenized domain and spatially constant ionic concentrations. Although such models provide valuable insight, the effect of altered ion concentrations or detailed cell morphology on the electrical potentials cannot be captured. In this paper, we discuss an alternative approach to detailed modelling of electrodiffusion in neural tissue. The mathematical model describes the distribution and evolution of ion concentrations in a geometrically-explicit representation of the intra- and extracellular domains. As a combination of the electroneutral Kirchhoff-Nernst-Planck (KNP) model and the Extracellular-Membrane-Intracellular (EMI) framework, we refer to this model as the KNP-EMI model. Here, we introduce and numerically evaluate a new, finite element-based numerical scheme for the KNP-EMI model, capable of efficiently and flexibly handling geometries of arbitrary dimension and arbitrary polynomial degree. Moreover, we compare the electrical potentials predicted by the KNP-EMI and EMI models. Finally, we study ephaptic coupling induced in an unmyelinated axon bundle and demonstrate how the KNP-EMI framework can give new insights in this setting.
Mixed dimensional partial differential equations (PDEs) are equations coupling unknown fields defined over domains of differing topological dimension. Such equations naturally arise in a wide range of scientific fields including geology, physiology, biology and fracture mechanics. Mixed dimensional PDEs are also commonly encountered when imposing non-standard conditions over a subspace of lower dimension e.g. through a Lagrange multiplier. In this paper, we present general abstractions and algorithms for finite element discretizations of mixed domain and mixed dimensional PDEs of co-dimension up to one (i.e. nD-mD with |n-m| <= 1). We introduce high level mathematical software abstractions together with lower level algorithms for expressing and efficiently solving such coupled systems. The concepts introduced here have also been implemented in the context of the FEniCS finite element software. We illustrate the new features through a range of examples, including a constrained Poisson problem, a set of Stokes-type flow models and a model for ionic electrodiffusion.
Uncertainty in diffusion parameters substantially impact the amount of tracer in gray and white matter, and the average tracer concentration in gray and white subregions.
Even with an uncertainty in the diffusion coefficient of a factor three, and a resulting fourfold variation in white matter tracer enhancement, discrepancies between simulations of diffusion and experimental data are too large to be attributed to uncertainties in the diffusion coefficient alone.
A convective velocity field modelling the glymphatic theory did not increase tracer enhancement in the brain parenchyma compared to pure diffusion. However, when a large-scale directional structure was added to this glymphatic velocity field, tracer inflow increased.
Our paper on Automated adjoints of coupled PDE-ODE systems is now published online in the SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing (SISC). Mathematical models that couple partial differential equations (PDEs) and spatially distributed ordinary differential equations (ODEs) arise in biology, medicine, chemistry, and many other fields. In this paper we discuss an extension to the FEniCS finite element software for expressing and efficiently solving such coupled systems. Given an ODE described using an augmentation of the Unified Form Language (UFL) and a discretization described by an arbitrary Butcher tableau, efficient code is automatically generated for the parallel solution of the ODE. The high-level description of the solution algorithm also facilitates the automatic derivation of the adjoint and tangent linearization of coupled PDE-ODE solvers. We demonstrate the capabilities of the approach on examples from cardiac electrophysiology and mitochondrial swelling.
Abstract: The usefulness of mechanistic models to disentangle complex multi-scale cancer processes such as treatment response has been widely acknowledged. However, a major barrier for multi-scale models to predict treatment outcomes in individual patients lies in their initialization and parametrization which need to reflect individual cancer characteristics accurately. In this study we use multi-type measurements acquired routinely on a single breast tumor, including histopathology, magnetic resonance imaging, and molecular profiling, to personalize parts of a complex multi-scale model of breast cancer treated with chemotherapeutic and anti-angiogenic agents. The model accounts for drug pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. We developed an open-source computer program that simulates cross-sections of tumors under 12-week therapy regimens and use it to individually reproduce and elucidate treatment outcomes of four patients. Two of the tumors did not respond to therapy, and model simulations were used to suggest alternative regimens with improved outcomes dependent on the tumor’s individual characteristics. It was determined that more frequent and lower doses of chemotherapy reduce tumor burden in a low proliferative tumor while lower doses of anti-angiogenic agents improve drug penetration in a poorly perfused tumor. Furthermore, using this model we were able to predict correctly the outcome in another patient after 12 weeks of treatment. In summary, our model bridges multi-type clinical data to shed light on individual treatment outcomes.
Over the last decade, there has been a significant renewed interest in the waterscape of the brain; that is, the physiological mechanisms governing cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and interstitial fluid (ISF) flow in (and around) the brain. A number of new theories have emerged, but a great deal of uncertainty relating to the roles of diffusion, convection and clearance within the brain remains. With this study, we aimed to rigorously quantify how the aforementioned uncertainties in the physiological parameters and in ISF flow affect the spread of a tracer into the brain. We assumed movement of tracer in the brain to occur by diffusion and/or convection. To account for uncertainty and variability, we circumvented the lack of precise parameter values by modelling velocity and diffusivity as Matérn stochastic fields. We then set up a PDE model with these stochastic (random) fields as coefficients and quantify the uncertainty in the model prediction via the Monte Carlo (MC) method.
Congratulations to Cécile Daversin-Catty for winning the Best postdoctoral presentation award at the FEniCS’18 conference at the University of Oxford from March 21-23 2018! Cécile, postdoctoral fellow with the Waterscales project, presented her exciting and versatile work on mixed-dimensional coupled finite elements in FEniCS.
Overall, the Waterscales and Waterscape projects were well represented in the FEniCS’18 program with additional talks from Waterscape post doc Travis Thompson (on Stokes-Biot stable H(div)-based mixed finite element methods for generalized poroelasticity), from SUURPh PhD candidate Eleonora Piersanti (on Parameter-robust discretization and preconditioning of the multiple-network poroelasticity equations), and a poster presentation from Waterscales PhD candidate Ada Ellingsrud (on Numerical modelling of the role of glial cells in cerebral interstitial fluid movement). Well done Waterscapers!
This week I’ve been in Odense for a PhD defense (Congratulations to Dr. Christian Valdemar Hansen!), while today I am giving at a talk at Nansensenteret i Bergen for a meeting organized by Norges Tekniske Vitenskapsakademi and Tekna. I will talk about the brain’s waterscape/Hjernens vannveier, of course. This presentation targets a semi-academic, semi-technical audience and the slides are publicly available.